Friday, September 21, 2007

Book Review: Marley and Me

After a lifetime as an animal lover and pet owner, and fifteen years working in the animal care industry, most breeds of dogs fall into one of two categories. The first is dogs I like, such as setters, pitbulls, French bull dogs and Boston terriers. The second is dogs I would never own, such as cocker spaniels, rottweilers and sharpeis. There is only one dog that appears on both lists, and that is the Labrador Retriever. Before the kids were born, John and I owned a sailboat and spent a lot of time on the water. John decided it would be a good idea to get a Lab, since they are water dogs. His choice of breed was based on the one Lab he had known, the uncommonly calm pet of a friend.

Labs are beautiful dogs. They’re strong and loyal and stoic and friendly. They’re also extremely energetic, difficult to train, frequently over exuberant and prone to being destructive. In short, they're big, sweet boneheads.

Last year, while shopping for a book on toddler sleep, I spotted Marley and Me: Life and Love With The World's Worst Dog by John Grogan on a table and was immediately drawn to it because of the picture of the yellow lab on the front. Last March, I purchased the book for my grandmother, and then ended up bringing it home from Michigan after her Memorial Service.

If you're an animal lover, you will love this book, and if you have any experience with crazy dogs, you'll love it even more.

John Grogan and his wife, Jenny, are newlyweds living in Florida. They decide to get a dog as "practice" for a baby, and end up with a yellow bundle of fur that they name Marley. Their choice of breed is based on dogs that they had as children, and that's about it. They learn--too late--that Marley's father was one of those crazed labs you hear about, and embark on a life with a slightly psychotic, neurotic, destructive maniac with a heart of gold. In between chewing up furniture, shredding door frames, eating jewelry and freaking out over thunderstorms, Marley lives his life with a complete and utter joy I've only seen in dogs and children. He jumps into pools, runs pellmell down beaches and plays fetch with abandon. He is there for the happiest and saddest moments of the Grogan family's life. His owners alternate between wondering what life would be like without him (no saliva on the furniture, no half eaten shoes, no broken screen doors, no landmines in the yard) and wondering how they would live without him (no sloppy dog kisses, no crazily wagging tail, no wild sled rides, no steadfast loyalty).

Grogan has a breezy writing style that flows easily, and his descriptions of cleaning up Marley's messes left me convulsed with laughter, especially since a lot of the things Marley did, my dog also did. The chapter in which Marley swallows the necklace was so funny, I laughed out loud. The lengths he went to in order to retrieve his wife's gift were disgusting but absolutely hilarious. Marley's behavior following Jenny's miscarriage and the births of her three babies made me smile through tears because I strongly believe that animals can sense human emotion and know when you need a furry hug. No household is complete without a pet, and even after reading about adventures in Marley-Land, we will probably get a dog some day.

As for the criticism's Grogan has received for his book, I don't find any of them to be founded on truth.

First of all, this is not a children's book and it was not marketed as such. Yes, it is about a family dog, but 'pet story' doesn't automatically translate into 'kid's story.' There is a description of a miscarriage and Grogan does use some curse words and adult humor, especially with regard to having the dog neutered. One reviewer said he thought the book was more about the Grogan's sex life than their dog, but I disagree. Grogan's narrative on family life after the birth of a baby is right on, and there is nothing raunchy or disgusting. Instead, the Grogan's love for each other is apparent and sex is treated as nothing more than a natural part of a loving and committed relationship.

Many reviewers criticized the Grogan's treatment of Marley with respect to his training, calling him a 'bad dog owner' and an animal abuser. If the reviewers had read the book a little more closely, they would have seen that Grogan does NOT 'kick his dog in the chest' and that if he is guilty of anything, it's following the advice of dog trainers. For the record the advice, a swift knee to the dog's chest when he jumped on people, is advice trainers have been giving for decades, and is, incidentally, the exact same method my family used to cure our pitbull from jumping on people. A method that was recommended by a dog trainer. I've seen some horrible cases of animal abuse and neglect in the 15 years I've been working with animals, and believe me, this is not it.

Also, I wonder if Grogan's critics actually have any experience with dogs that are afraid of thunderstorms. Thunderstorm anxiety is one of the hardest behavior problems to deal with, and even sedatives don't always work. An oral medication takes so long to take effect that the storm is often over with by the time the drugs kick in. Even a meteorologist can't predict thunderstorms 100% of the time, so expecting the Grogans to do it is insane. Is it horrible and mean to lock a dog in a ventilated, destruction-proof garage on those occasions that the owner needs to leave the house? I don't think so, and as the family spent thousands of dollars repairing or replacing things that Marley destroyed, I think they showed admirable patience with their dog's problems. Could they have done things better or differently? Of course, but that also applies to probably 99% of dog owners. Some of the worst behaved animals I have known have belonged to dog groomers and veterinarians. A dog's behavior is not always a reflection of his owner.

Finally, I question the priorities of some of the reviewers. Is it fair to deny a family vacation to three little kids because the dog will need to be boarded? Is is reasonable to put a dog through a major surgery that will cost thousands of dollars when the dog is already thirteen years old and the vet has already said it's not a good idea? Can a stranger make a judgement on when an animal should be euthanized? Unless those individuals were in the Grogan household, they don't have any real insight into Marley's quality of life and have no business questioning the Grogan's decisions regarding Marley's treatment. What comes through loud and clear is the family's love for their crazy pet and that they did the best they could to make life enjoyable for all involved. Too many people would have dumped Marley back with the breeder, or worse yet, in a shelter or on the side of the road, but this family did what I can only admire. They took responsibility for their animal, even when he was messy, smelly, destructive, annoying or inconvenient, and that is a lesson a lot of pet owners need to learn.

4 comments:

Jen said...

I loved Marley & Me. I thought it was wonderful, and I was amazed at their patience with that dog! I agree with you about the criticisms it received, they are unfounded.

VDog said...

I LOVE this book. I made the mistake, though, of reading it while I was 10 weeks pregnant, and ended up bawling for a good portion of the book.

We are really lucky with CrackerDog Sasha -- she is like the perfect yellow lab -- lazy, docile, easy to train, submissive, has never destroyed anything, etc. Sometimes we wish she had a bit more life to her! Poor old gal...

Anonymous said...

I was just curious about your comment on not wanting to own lab. I have been around labs for years, and on the whole disagree with your comments. As for these statements: "They’re also extremely energetic, difficult to train, frequently over exuberant and prone to being destructive. In short, they're big, sweet boneheads." Labs, like all dogs, require training and attention from their owners and like children, don't raise themselves. I have had nothing but positive experiences with labs and all they need is direction, training, and consistency. Labs are quite smart and easy to train. They certainly have lots of energy and nip as puppies but I haven't met a puppy that doesn't. Dog owners and prospective dog owners who are responsible would do research and a reputable breeder prevent many of these issues. It's interesting that having children that you would be open to owning a pit bull, which although many says are great dogs and need to be raised well, I wholeheartedly disagree with this. I have known many pit bulls to snap and turn their owners and families in an instant and be put down. Even purchasing a pit bull from a good breeder is dicey. Labs have their faults but are through and through an excellent dog and for good reason, beloved by many.

MommyK said...

First of all, it's easier to respond and make sure that you receive it if you leave an email address.

That said, thanks for your visit and comment.

I do agree with you that labs are great dogs. But having worked in the animal care field for 15 years, I've come to the overwhelming conclusion that labs are animals that do not belong in certain households. Smart as they are, they require a strong hand (both figuratively and literally) to train into a well mannered animal. I've seen many people who get a lab because they have a reputation for being "family dogs" and they're probably the breed most often used in animal related advertising. However, an energetic lab is a completely different story than an energetic poodle, and I believe a lot of people get labs because they think they are great dogs but know little else about the breed, just like the Grogans did. The Grogans deserve credit, because they stuck with Marley, even with all his faults, but how many other labs end up in shelters or breed rescues? And how many people actually go to a reputable breeder instead of a puppy mill churning out dogs with behavior problems, hip dysplasia or ear/skin disease? I can't count the number of clients who bring in a young lab and ask, "When will he calm down?" Few of those owners have the time and knowledge neccesary to turn an exuberant dog, no matter how smart and loyal, into an animal who responds to commands and who gets adequate exercise.

As for pitbulls, you'll notice that both pitbulls and labs are listed in my "breeds I like" category. Nowhere did I say that I would recommend getting a pitbull to a family. I owned a pitbull mix years ago and he was a wonderful dog, but he was not without his faults. The difference lies in being able to identify those faults and make sure they don't become a tragic problem. A good example is an incident that happened in West Baltimore last week. A man owned a pitbull as a guard dog and it was shot to death by the police when it attacked and killed the puppy next door. While the man is well within his rights to have a guard dog, he missed the part about being responsible for the safety of those around the dog, and the fence that separated the two yards was little more than a rabbit fence. The police were more than justified in shooting the animal.

And while I owned a pitbull and like the breed, I'm not denying that they can be scary or dangerous. And I would never tell a family with children to get one and I would never bring an adult pitbull into my own home, no matter how many people say it is a nice dog. That goes for other breeds as well. Until our children are old enough to comprehend the correct way to behave around a dog, we won't get one.

Rebecca Skloot, former vet tech and science writer wrote this piece on breed bans in which she mentions temperament tests and some popular breeds. I think it's worth a read.

I think if you reread my piece, you'll see that I am not debating that labs are or are not great dogs. I just firmly believe that they do not belong is certain households and that many many owners don't know what they are getting into when they adopt a lab.